MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4207070314 · doi:10.1142/s0218127422300014

Meet ANIBOT: The First Biologically-Inspired Animal Robot

2022· article· en· W4207070314 on OpenAlexaff
Visarath In, Andy Kho, Patrick Longhini, Joseph Neff, Antonio Palacios, Pietro-Luciano Buono

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRealization (probability)Central pattern generatorRobotJumpComputer scienceGenerator (circuit theory)CpG siteTopology (electrical circuits)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsPhysicsEngineeringBiologyPower (physics)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the first circuit realization of an animal (quadruped) robot controlled by a Central Pattern Generator (CPG) network of neurons, whose model and design are biologically-inspired [Golubitsky et al., 1998, 1999]. We demonstrate, through hardware simulations of the CPG network and through video snapshots, that our electronic CPG and our animal robot can indeed reproduce, via symmetry-breaking Hopf bifurcations, all primary gaits — walk, jump, trot, bound, pace, and pronk — just as they were originally predicted by theory. The design and development of the circuit realization are discussed in great detail.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and ChaosSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207