MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4207078093 · doi:10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.12.005

What motivates Jordanians to adopt mobile commerce? An empirical study of the most relevant factors

2022· article· en· W4207078093 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mahmud Alkailani, Nawras M. Nusairat

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Data and Network Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOrganizational and Employee Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStructural equation modelingUsabilityMobile commerceAffect (linguistics)Social commerceConceptual modelTechnology acceptance modelSocial influenceExternal variablePsychologyEmpirical researchConceptual frameworkKnowledge managementRisk perceptionMarketingBusinessApplied psychologySocial psychologySocial mediaComputer scienceWorld Wide WebSociologyStatisticsPerceptionMathematicsHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aims to empirically investigate the most influential factors that affect the adoption of Mobile commerce (m-commerce). in Jordan. The factors explored in this study are: Perceived Risk (PR), Perceived enjoyment (PE), perceived ease of use (PEOU), relative advantage (RA), and social Influence (SI). A conceptual framework was proposed to show relationships between variables. Data was collected using surveys collected from 358 participants. Hypotheses were tested using a Structural Equation Modeling [SEM] and the results showed that all independent variables being investigated had significant effects on users' intention to adopt mobile commerce in Jordan. Based on the research findings, several recommendations and implications were reported for academics and companies. Suggestions for future research were also provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Data and Network ScienceSame topicOrganizational and Employee PerformanceFrench-language works237,207