Characterization of chitinases excreted by<i>Bacillus cereus</i>CH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bacillus cereus CH was shown to excrete chitinases into the culture supernatant when cultivated in a medium containing 0.2% colloidal chitin, whereas the removal of colloidal chitin resulted in a low activity. After concentration of the culture supernatant by precipitation with ammonium sulfate, the induced chitinases were purified by sequential chromatography. Four different chitinases, A, B1, B2, and B3 with molecular masses of 35, 47, 58, and 64 kDa, respectively, were separated. All chitinases showed similarities in their kinetic parameters when observed with colloidal chitin, including an optimal pH of 5.0-7.5, and an optimal temperature between 50-60°C. Chitinase A hydrolyzed glycol chitin and p-nitrophenyl-di-N-acetyl-beta-chitobioside at similar rates to that of colloidal chitin, whereas group B chitinases hydrolyzed both substrates in much lower rates. From analyses of the reaction products, it is most likely that chitinase A and all group B chitinases hydrolyze the substrates tested in an endo-fashion. However, group B chitinases were distinct from chitinase A in possessing high transglycosylation activity. From amino terminal sequencing, chitinases B1, B2, and B3 were shown to have almost identical sequences, which differed from that of chitinase A. The similarities in the reaction modes and amino terminal sequences among chitinases B1, B2, and B3 suggest that these chitinases may be derived from a presumptive precursor protein through C-terminal processing.Key words: Bacillus cereus, chitinase, purification, characterization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".