Success of Revascularization of Pulp in Necrotic Maxillary Anterior Immature Permanent Teeth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of the study was to examine efficacy of this procedure in necrotic immature permanent teeth. Methods: Forty patients were enrolled for pulp revascularization procedure by disinfecting the root canal with triple antibiotics paste for one to two weeks, followed by creating the blood clot, sealing the canal orifice with mineral trioxide aggregate as sealing material. Patients were recalled periodically for up to twenty four months. Results: Clinical evaluations demonstrated no adverse effects, during follow up 35 patients were asymptomatic, five cases of periapical periodontitis showed disappearance of sinus tract, on radiographic assessment there was progressive resolution of periapical radiolucency within first three-six months, the electric pulp test on sixth week demonstrated positive response, on radiographic evaluation there was progressive root length and thickness and continued root growth on six –twelfth months. Conclusion: Revascularization is a safe and efficacious method of dental pulp regeneration in this study. Keywords: Necrosis, Immature Permanent Teeth, Revascularization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".