MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210259318 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2021-0100

Constraints on the age of <i>Archaeozoon acadiense</i> and evidence for hydrothermally transported zircon in the Ashburn Formation (Green Head Group), Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

2022· article· en· W4210259318 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Donald W. Davis, Sandra M. Barr, Chris E. White

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsNova Scotia Department of EnergyAcadia UniversityUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsZirconGeologyPrecambrianGeochemistryPaleozoicStromatoliteProterozoicArcheanPaleontologyCarbonate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zircon grains from metasiltstone beds in the Precambrian Ashburn Formation were dated to constrain the age of the stromatolite Archaeozoon acadiense. The largest group of analyzed grains consists of mostly well-rounded detrital zircon no younger than 1060 Ma with significant peaks at about 1200–1100, 1500, 1800, 2050, and 2700 Ma, as well as a few Mesoarchean ages. A second population of apparently euhedral grains gives ages in the range 680–400 Ma. The distribution of detrital zircon ages along with field relationships suggest that the Ashburn and Martinon formations are proximal and distal parts of the Green Head Group, respectively, and hence a previously reported maximum depositional age of ca. 602 ± 8 Ma for the Martinon Formation also applies to stromatolite in the Ashburn Formation. Paleozoic zircon recovered from the Ashburn Formation cannot be detrital because the rocks were intruded and contact metamorphosed by the Golden Grove Plutonic Suite at ca. 550–525 Ma. The Paleozoic zircon grains were found in four independently processed samples and have also been seen in other studies in the region, showing that they are not due to laboratory contamination. Zircon formed during younger magmatic activity may have been transported in hydrothermal fluids and emplaced into these metasedimentary rocks in veins. A single euhedral zircon recovered from an atypically thick vein gave an age of 659 ± 33 Ma. Hydrothermally transported zircon might provide a window into younger igneous processes for which evidence is not otherwise preserved in this and other areas.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.165

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→