MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210281511 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3147840

Information Dissemination With Service-Oriented Incentive Mechanism in Industrial Internet of Things

2022· article· en· W4210281511 on OpenAlexaff
Yangfanyu Yang, Kefei Cheng, Yu Wu, Xiaokang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Internet of Things Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
FundersChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation
KeywordsIncentiveComputer scienceThe InternetService (business)Information DisseminationDisseminationInformation systemDistributed computingKnowledge managementRisk analysis (engineering)Computer securityWorld Wide WebBusinessTelecommunicationsEngineeringMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As one of the essential paradigms of Industrial 4.0, the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) challenges existing data management and information services by supporting computational-intensive applications, in which devices share and receive information through interactions under resource constraints. When there exist diverse service requirements of IIoT applications, information dissemination will be more likely driven by service-oriented incentives. In this article, a novel information dissemination process with the service-oriented incentive mechanism is analyzed and modeled in IIoT, which depicts the dynamical evolution of IIoT devices’ interactions. In particular, the characteristics of service-oriented activating and dissemination degenerating are considered due to the unique capability of IIoT devices. Extensive theoretical and simulation results verify the dynamical behaviors of information dissemination, including the propagation threshold, equilibrium, and stability. In addition, comparative simulations have demonstrated the service-oriented incentive mechanism further expands information diffusion by driving the participation of IIoT devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.472

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Internet of Things JournalSame topicBlockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFrench-language works237,207