MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210292610 · doi:10.3138/ctr.189.002

Keeping Good Company

2022· article· en· W4210292610 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Shira Leuchter

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Theatre Review · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpromptuVisual artsPerforming artsArtAestheticsHobbyDanceMedia studiesSociologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A personal reflection on how Shira Leuchter’s desire to preserve existent family memories led her to create the live art performance All the Things I’ve Lost, which she performed with her mother, Joyce. All the Things I’ve Lost was commissioned by the Gardiner Museum in Toronto and premiered in August 2016. Through performing the piece, Shira discovered that casting her mother to help her recreate lost childhood objects prompted audience members to share their stories of loss with her during impromptu sessions after each performance. Acknowledging the apparent need for sharing and companioning stories of loss, Shira created the live art performance Lost Together. Lost Together premiered as part of the SummerWorks Festival Lab in 2018. While Shira and co-performer Michaela Washburn recreate and reimagine lost things for audience participants during this intimate performance, Shira recognizes that they can never be successful in resolving loss for their audience participants. Instead, they can hold the weight of the loss with their audience and offer community and connection. Shira contends that collaborating with audiences and leading with tenderness is a radical act of performing care in a culture that prizes individualism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1750.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Theatre ReviewSame topicMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationFrench-language works237,207