MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4210297452 · doi:10.1161/str.53.suppl_1.wmp97

Abstract WMP97: Differences Between Atrial Fibrillation Detected Before And After Stroke And Tia: A Systematic Review & Meta-analysis

2022· review· en· W4210297452 on OpenAlexaff
Sebastián Fridman, Amado Jimenez Ruiz, Juan Camilo C Vargas-Gonzalez, Luciano A. Sposato

Bibliographic record

VenueStroke · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAtrial fibrillationStroke (engine)Internal medicineHeart failureOdds ratioCardiologyMeta-analysisConfidence intervalEjection fractionCoronary artery diseaseStrictly standardized mean difference

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Purpose: Recent evidence suggests that patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) detected after stroke ( AFDAS ) may have a lower prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities and lower risk of stroke recurrence than AF known before stroke ( KAF ). We performed a systematic search and meta-analysis to compare the characteristics of AFDAS and KAF. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE for articles reporting differences between AFDAS and KAF until 30-June-2021. We performed random- or fixed-effects meta-analyses to evaluate differences between AFDAS and KAF in demographic factors, vascular risk factors, prevalent vascular comorbidities, structural heart disease, stroke severity, insular cortex involvement, stroke recurrence, and death. Results: We included 21 studies comprising 22,566 patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Patients with AFDAS had a lower CHA2DS2-VASc score (standardized mean difference [ SMD ] -0.47, 95% confidence interval [ 95% CI ] -0.60, -0.34), and lower prevalence of vascular comorbidities including coronary artery disease (odds ratio [ OR ] 0.50, 95%CI 0.42, 0.61), congestive heart failure (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.31, 0.44), peripheral artery disease (OR 0.44, 95%CI 0.29, 0.68), and previous stroke (RD 0.38, 95% CI 0.25, 0.58). Patients with AFDAS had a higher left ventricular ejection fraction (SMD 0.25, 95% CI 0.20, 0.30) and smaller mean atrial diameter (SMD -0.65, 95% CI -0.99, -0.31) than those with KAF. There were no differences in age, sex, stroke severity, or death rates between AFDAS and KAF. There were not enough studies to report differences in insular cortex involvement between AF types. Conclusions: We found significant differences in the prevalence of vascular comorbidities, structural heart disease, and stroke recurrence rates between AFDAS and KAF, suggesting that they constitute different clinical entities within the AF spectrum.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.043
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.162
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStroke→Same topicAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→