Psychiatric Manifestations in Patients with Biopterin Defects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Psychiatric manifestations in patients with tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) defects are common, and may occur even with treatment of the underlying disorder. The neurobiological background of these conditions has been linked to abnormalities of neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, serotonin, norepinephrine, and gamma-aminobutyric acid. Here, we review the psychiatric profile of all patients with BH4 defects followed in the pediatric and adult metabolic clinics at our center. Three patients with autosomal recessive (AR) guanosine triphosphate cyclohydrolase (GTPCH) deficiency and three patients with 6-pyruvoyl tetrahydropterin synthase (PTPS) deficiency were reviewed.All patients had behavioral disturbances and two had significant psychiatric comorbidities. These included attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, anxiety, depression, aggression, or oppositional defiant disorder. One patient with PTPS deficiency had a severe psychiatric presentation, requiring inpatient admission and temporary placement into foster care for intensive behavioral therapy. Another with AR GTPCH deficiency was diagnosed with aggressive behavioral dysregulation requiring intensive psychiatric treatment. Management of the psychiatric manifestations of BH4 defects can be challenging, due to lack of information and studies of interactions between psychiatric medications on the deficient neurotransmitters and their receptors in these conditions. Further studies are needed to establish safety and efficacy of these treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".