MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210313206 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00636.2021

Sex-specific effects of prenatal hypoxia on the cardiac endothelin system in adult offspring

2022· article· en· W4210313206 on OpenAlexafffund
Nataliia Hula, Jennie Vu, Anita Quon, Raven Kirschenman, Floor Spaans, Ricky Ini Liu, Christy‐Lynn M. Cooke, Sandra T. Davidge

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBirth, Development, and Health
Canadian institutionsWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchAlberta InnovatesStollery Children’s Hospital FoundationGovernment of CanadaUniversity of AlbertaAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesWomen and Children's Health Research Institute
KeywordsOffspringInternal medicineEndocrinologyHypoxia (environmental)Endothelin 1FetusEndothelin receptorMedicinePregnancyBiologyReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrated that prenatal hypoxia (a common condition of pregnancy) can have profound differential effects on treatment strategies in adult cardiovascular disease. Our data using a rat model of prenatal hypoxia demonstrated that, as adults, although inhibition of endothelin (ET)A receptors before an ex vivo cardiac ischemic insult improved recovery in females, it strikingly prevented recovery in males. Our data indicate a sex-specific effect of prenatal hypoxia on the cardiac ET-1 system in adult offspring.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicBirth, Development, and HealthFrench-language works237,207