MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210333937 · doi:10.1002/suco.202100265

Transfer length of corroded wires in prestressed concrete members

2022· article· en· W4210333937 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Concrete · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasEuropean Commission
KeywordsCorrosionPrestressed concreteBondStructural engineeringMaterials scienceTransfer (computing)Bond lengthAction (physics)Composite numberComposite materialForensic engineeringEngineeringComputer sciencePhysicsChemistryCrystallography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bond is an essential property that guarantees the composite action in prestressed concrete (PC) members. This bond may be degraded due to different reasons, corrosion‐induced damage being one of the most frequent ones. The transfer length is the key indicator that describes the bond properties between prestressing steel and concrete. The analysis and design of PC members with prestressing wires require a realistic assessment of the bond transfer length. This paper presents an analytical study of the influence of the governing geometrical and mechanical variables on bond behavior in PC members undergoing steel corrosion. A model describing the deterioration of the transfer length due to corrosion, calibrated and verified through experimental tests, is proposed along with simplified expressions for the assessment of transfer lengths in PC members with corroded wires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it