MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210347348 · doi:10.17918/00000764

Successful living with autoimmune arthritis

2021· dissertation· en· W4210347348 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kimberly Ann Steinbarger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersStrong
KeywordsArthritisMedicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective. The course of autoimmune arthritis varies by individual and can cause significant and progressive decline in physical function, mental health, social independence, and financial stability. This disease process has also been linked to early mortality, often due to complications from infections or cardiovascular disease. While intervention from health professionals is paramount for this population, education is also imperative to enable patients to collaborate successfully with the healthcare team. Persons with autoimmune disease require education about the disease process and self-management techniques to develop self-efficacy in managing their disease within their daily lives. The first aim of this mixed methods study was to develop and evaluate a disease self-management program based on Self-Determination Theory (SDT) for participants with autoimmune arthritis. The second aim was to evaluate the participants' outcomes, with emphasis on any behavioral changes noted after attending the program. Methods. Four adult participants with physician-diagnosed arthritis attended a 6-session disease self-management program. Eight content topics were developed and delivered over the 6-week period by an interprofessional team consisting of the primary instructor and five student instructors (three physical therapy students and two pharmacy students). The content was evaluated using weekly session evaluation forms, as well as semi-structured post-program interviews conducted individually with the participants, and collectively with the student instructors. Participants' outcomes were measured using five outcome measures validated for this population; namely, the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI); Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale, 8-item version (ASES); Patient Knowledge Questionnaire (PKQ); Short Form 36 Health survey (SF-36); and McMaster Toronto Arthritis Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire (MACTAR), which were completed by the participants both before and after the program. Results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed ranks test with a significance set at 0.10. One month after the program ended, participants completed a semi-structured interview to explore their thoughts about the program and any health behavior changes noted. Qualitative data were analyzed using generic qualitative inquiry and the three tenets of SDT: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Results. Participants found the content helpful, the delivery effective, and the program acceptable, even though they had been living with their arthritic conditions for several years. Both participants and students felt the ongoing program was feasible, however, they suggested a larger group, attempting to recruit some younger people for the group, and adding guest speakers. Participants' suggestions for additional topics included involving a recently graduated rheumatologist (suggestive of being more up to date on recent findings), information about Cannabidiol (CBD) supplements, and the relationship between diabetes and rheumatic disease. Only one of the five standardized measures, the PKQ, demonstrated a difference (p = 0.07) from the beginning to end of the program with an effect size of r = .65. The MACTAR scores did not reach significance, but the effect size was r = .57. The 1-month, post-program qualitative interviews revealed positive health behavior changes, including self-selected physical activities, advocacy for self, knowledge seeking, and acquisition of new adaptive or exercise equipment, all related to the tenets of SDT. Conclusion. Because of the small, homogenous sample size, participant outcomes cannot be extrapolated to the population at large, but the qualitative results demonstrate that this type of program, based on SDT, is both feasible to offer again with modifications, and acceptable to the participants. This program shows promise in facilitating positive behavior changes in individuals with autoimmune arthritis. Keywords: arthritis, self-determination theory, disease self-management, rheumatic disease

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207