MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210349275 · doi:10.5206/tba.v3i1.13882

Representational Possibilities in Landscape Photography: William Earle Williams and Dawoud Bey

2021· article· en· W4210349275 on OpenAlexaffvenue
David Jones

Bibliographic record

Venuetba Journal of Art Media and Visual Culture · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographies of human-animal interactions
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubjectivityPhotographyScholarshipRelevance (law)Landscape paintingArtHistoryArt historyVisual artsSociologyLawPhilosophyPaintingPolitical scienceEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the course of this essay, the lens-based practices of William Earle Williams and Dawoud Bey become a site of a genre analysis. Both photographers foreground histories of chattel slavery in the United States through the employment of absence in landscape photography. The essay entails a close study of how Williams and Bey position their subjectivity to expand beyond previous conventions in landscape photography and reorient how viewers engage with such work. Through a range of interdisciplinary scholarship, the means of tracing Williams and Bey’s respective expressions highlights the potential of landscape to address sites of historical and cultural relevance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuetba Journal of Art Media and Visual CultureSame topicGeographies of human-animal interactionsFrench-language works237,207