The effect of supplier performance and transformational supply chain leadership style on supply chain performance in manufacturing companies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between supplier performance and supply chain performance, transformational supply chain leadership and supply chain performance, and between supplier performance and transformational supply chain leadership. The study uses a company analysis unit represented by one of the managers in the chain management section. The study also uses quantitative methods and data processing tools using SmartPLS 3.3.3. The population in this study is a manufacturing company in Tangerang. Two hundred and fifty online questionnaires were distributed to each company and 220 eligible respondents were tested. Based on the results of data analysis, it is found that there is a positive and significant relationship between supplier performance and supply chain performance, a positive and significant relationship exists between transformational supply chain leadership and supply chain performance and there is a positive and significant relationship between supplier performance and transformational supply chain leadership.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it