MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210353335 · doi:10.4000/rsa.4858

Comment la sociologie trouve-t-elle son fait ?

2021· article· fr· W4210353335 on OpenAlexaff
Jacques Hamel

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches sociologiques et anthropologiques · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le présent article cherche à connaître le fait, le fait social, à l’origine de la connaissance sociologique. Quel est-il ? Quelle est sa “matérialité” ? Comment se conçoit-il pour être l’objet de l’étude propre à la sociologie ? Après avoir envisagé la thèse classique selon laquelle la “réalité” correspond à une “cons­truction sociale”, toujours changeante, le texte aborde le sujet sur le plan proprement épistémologique en se penchant sur les opérations de la transmutation du fait en objet scientifique. Une illustration est enfin donnée pour montrer que cette transmutation est possible en sociologie sans que celle-ci amène à penser que le fait n’est que pure “construction sociale”, donc sans autre matérialité, et par conséquent sans qu’il se révèle relatif à tous égards.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.026
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0260.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.022
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.602
GPT teacher head0.573
Teacher spread0.029 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches sociologiques et anthropologiquesSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207