MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210354290 · doi:10.3390/electronics11030474

Energy Efficiency and Throughput Maximization Using Millimeter Waves–Microwaves HetNets

2022· article· en· W4210354290 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMillimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceThroughputHeterogeneous networkMathematical optimizationMillimeterParticle swarm optimizationOptimization problemEfficient energy useMaximizationElectronic engineeringComputer networkAlgorithmEngineeringTelecommunicationsWirelessWireless networkElectrical engineeringMathematicsPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The deployment of millimeter waves can fulfil the stringent requirements of high bandwidth and high energy efficiency in fifth generation (5G) networks. Still, millimeter waves communication is challenging because it requires line of sight (LOS). The heterogeneous network (HetNet) of millimeter waves and microwaves solves this problem. This paper proposes a millimeter -microwaves heterogeneous HetNet deployed in an indoor factory (InF). In InF, the manufacturing and production are performed inside big and small halls. We consider non standalone dual-mode base stations (DMBS) working on millimeter waves and microwaves. We analyze the network in terms of throughput and energy efficiency (EE). We formulate mixed-integer-non-linear-programming (MINLP) to maximize the throughput and EE of the network. The formulated problem is a complex optimization problem and hard to solve with exhaustive search. We propose a novel outer approximation algorithm (OAA) to solve this problem, and the proposed algorithm OAA achieves optimal solution at β = 10−3. At this β, the average throughput value obtained is approximately 50 Mbps, whereas the value of EE is 4.4 Mbits/J. We also compare the performance of OAA with the mesh-adaptive-direct-search-algorithm (NOMAD), and the experimental results verify that OAA outperforms NOMAD in terms of throughput and EE maximization. We also compare the performance of OAA with particle swarm optimization (PSO), genetic algorithm (GA), and many others optimization algorithms. Experimental results verify that OAA outperforms all other algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.674
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it