MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Le Salon ou l’histoire des goûts et des modes

2010· book-chapter· fr· W4210355838 on OpenAlexaff
Eva Bouillo

Bibliographic record

VenueÉditions Rue d’Ulm eBooks · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le Salon, principal lieu où les artistes pouvaient exposer, se faire une réputation, trouver commanditaires et acquéreurs, était au début du xixe siècle un passage incontournable conditionnant l’accès à une carrière et aux honneurs. De ce fait, cette vitrine de l’art contemporain constitue un outil de mesure permettant d’évaluer les goûts et les modes d’une époque. Déterminer les thèmes privilégiés par l’Administration en 1827 et leur évolution de 1817 à 1827, tel est l’objet de cette étude. ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.746
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0150.011
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉditions Rue d’Ulm eBooksSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207