MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210368248 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1232789/v1

Anemia and Adverse Outcomes in Pregnancy: Subgroup analysis of the CLIP Cluster-Randomized Trial in India

2022· preprint· en· W4210368248 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey N. Bone, Mrutyunjaya B. Bellad, Shivaprasad S. Goudar, Ashalata Mallapur, Umesh Charantimath, Umesh Y Ramadurg, Geetanjali Katageri, Maria Lesperance, Mai‐Lei Woo Kinshella, Raiya Suleman, Sumedha Sharma, Marianne Vidler, Richard J. Derman, Laura A. Magee, Peter von Dadelszen

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIron Metabolism and Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsMedicineAnemiaPregnancyConfidence intervalConfoundingRelative riskObstetricsPopulationAdverse effectRandomized controlled trialPediatricsInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<title>Abstract</title> <bold>Background</bold>Iron-deficiency anemia is a known risk factor for several adverse perinatal outcomes, but its impact on maternal morbidity is less certain. Further, data on associations between anemia in early pregnancy and subsequent outcomes are understudied. <bold>Methods</bold>The study population was derived from the Community Level Interventions for Pre-eclampsia (CLIP) trial in Karnataka State, India (NCT01911494). Included were women who were enrolled in either trial arm, delivered by trial end date, and had a baseline measure of hemoglobin (Hb). Anemia was classified by WHO standards into four groups: none (Hb ≥ 11 g/dL), mild (10.0g/dL ≤ Hb &lt; 11.0 g/dL), moderate (7.0g/dL ≤ Hb &lt; 10.0 g/dL) and severe (Hb &lt; 7.0 g/dL). Targeted maximum likelihood estimation was used to estimate confounder-adjusted associations between anemia and a composite (and its components) of adverse maternal outcomes, including pregnancy hypertension. E-values were calculated to assess robustness to unmeasured confounding.<bold>Results</bold>Of 11,370 women included, 10,066 (88.5%) had anemia, that was mild (3690, 32.5%), moderate (6023, 53.0%), or severe (68, 0.6%). Almost all women (&gt;99%) reported taking iron supplements during pregnancy. Blood transfusions was more often administered to those with anemia that was mild (risk ratio [RR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-3.56), moderate (RR 2.37, 95% CI 1.56-3.59), and severe (RR 5.70, 95% CI 3.00-10.85). No significant association was evident between anemia severity and haemorrhage (antepartum or postpartum) or sepsis, but there was a U-shaped association between anemia severity and pregnancy hypertension and pre-eclampsia specifically, with the lowest risk seen among those with mild or moderate anemia.<bold>Conclusion</bold>In Karnataka State, India, current management strategies for mild-moderate anemia in early pregnancy are associated with similar rates of adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes, and a lower risk of pregnancy hypertension and preeclampsia, compared with no anemia in early pregnancy. Future research should focus on risk mitigation for women with severe anemia, and the potential effect of iron supplementation for women with normal Hb in early pregnancy.<bold>Funding</bold>PRE-EMPT, a grant awarded to University of British Columbia by the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation (# OPP1017337).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.135
Threshold uncertainty score0.941

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicIron Metabolism and DisordersFrench-language works237,207