Teaching English as a Foreign Language to 4th Grade Students by Using Technology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Language is one of the most important components that affect international communication activities. Technology plays a crucial role for teachers to facilitate language learning for their students. Each language class frequently uses various forms of technology. Technology has been used to help and improve language learning process. With the help of technology, teachers adapt classroom activities by enhancing the language learning process. The study was conducted on 4th grade students studying at different schools affiliated to the Ministry of National Education in the 2020-2021 academic year. The study was carried out with a total of 10 students. In this study, qualitative research design was used based on the method used concerning participant observations and in-depth interviews. Motivation scale, presentations for English course and online education and computer-aided teaching software were used to collect data in the study. The results have examined how technology influences foreign language learning and how it aids to students in reading while learning English.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it