MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210383484

Roadmap on digital holography [Invited]

2021· review· en· W4210383484 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueDipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDigital Holography and Microscopy
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónBoard of Research in Nuclear SciencesEuropean Research CouncilArmy Research OfficeNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaScience and Engineering Research BoardHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeIsrael Science FoundationUniversitat Jaume IHong Kong Polytechnic UniversityGeneralitat ValencianaIntelligence Advanced Research Projects ActivityFord Motor CompanyNational Research Foundation SingaporeNational Research Foundation of KoreaCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaEuropean CommissionCanada Foundation for InnovationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsDigital holographyHolographyDigital holographic microscopyComputer scienceVirtual realityField (mathematics)Computer graphics (images)Digital imagingAugmented realityIdentification (biology)OpticsArtificial intelligenceComputer visionDigital imageImage processingPhysicsImage (mathematics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This Roadmap article on digital holography provides an overview of a vast array of research activities in the field of digital holography. The paper consists of a series of 25 sections from the prominent experts in digital holography presenting various aspects of the field on sensing, 3D imaging and displays, virtual and augmented reality, microscopy, cell identification, tomography, label-free live cell imaging, and other applications. Each section represents the vision of its author to describe the significant progress, potential impact, important developments, and challenging issues in the field of digital holography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it