MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210387923 · doi:10.1002/msc.1616

Does preoperative physiotherapy improve outcomes in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review

2022· review· en· W4210387923 on OpenAlex
Dimitrios Vasileiadis, Georgios I. Drosos, Georgios Charitoudis, Ismene Dontas, John Vlamis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMusculoskeletal Care · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical therapyVisual analogue scaleRandomized controlled trialRehabilitationRange of motionCochrane LibraryOsteoarthritisQuality of life (healthcare)Psychological interventionArthroplastyTotal knee arthroplastyMEDLINETimed Up and Go testPatient satisfactionMeta-analysisSurgeryBalance (ability)Internal medicineAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the scientific literature and to investigate the effectiveness of preoperative rehabilitation on subjective and objective outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) when compared with patients in a control group. DATA SOURCES: A search was conducted in PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, Cochrane Library and Physiotherapy Evidence Database databases in May 2021. STUDY SELECTION: randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were reviewed if they compared a preoperative physiotherapy exercise intervention with no intervention group for patients undergoing TKA for severe Osteoarthritis (OA). A total of 24 RCTs were included at the end of the evaluation process. By the end of the evaluation process, a total of 24 RCTs were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. The outcomes were knee extension, knee flexion, pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), overall Western Ontario and McMaster Universities OA Index, 6 min walking test, and Timed Up and Go test. RESULTS: The majority of the studies included in this systemic review demonstrated a comparable trend of long-term postoperative improvement of knee extension strength, VAS, range of movement and functional scores, and those of quality of life between two groups. Many studies showed a significant improvement in terms of preoperative pain, length of hospital stay and functional performance shortly after the operation, but all studies failed to show a prolonged effect on knee motion or patient function between 3 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Low to moderate evidence from mostly small RCTs demonstrated that preoperative physiotherapy interventions reduce pain and improve functional performance for patients with knee OA prior shortly after the TKA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it