MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210393971 · doi:10.3138/jammi-2021-0029

<i>Mycobacterium fortuitum</i> peritoneal dialysis-related peritonitis in a child: A case report and review of the literature

2022· article· en· W4210393971 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Kathryn Haubrich, Cherry Mammen, Inna Sekirov, Hana Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMycobacterium research and diagnosis
Canadian institutionsBC Centre for Disease ControlBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMycobacterium fortuitumClofaziminePeritoneal dialysisPeritonitisPopulationSurgeryMycobacteriumTuberculosisDermatologyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are an uncommon but serious cause of peritoneal dialysis (PD)–related infections. NTM peritonitis typically necessitates PD catheter removal, PD withdrawal, and aggressive, prolonged antimicrobial treatment. Few reported cases of NTM peritonitis in the pediatric population exist. METHODS: We describe a case of a 9-year-old boy on PD after kidney allograft failure who developed Mycobacterium fortuitum peritonitis, and we summarize the available literature on M. fortuitum peritonitis in pediatric patients receiving PD. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Therapeutic options were limited by adverse medication effects and risk of drug–drug interactions in a patient with complex mental health comorbidities. Clofazimine presented an acceptable oral treatment option for long-term therapy in combination with ciprofloxacin and was well tolerated by this patient. Prompt PD catheter removal followed by 6 months of dual antimicrobial therapy resulted in a full recovery and successful re-transplantation with no infection relapse.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease CanadaSame topicMycobacterium research and diagnosisFrench-language works237,207