Perioperative Stroke and Thirty-Day Hospital Readmission After Cardiac Surgeries: State Inpatient Database Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Readmission rates are an important metric for evaluating healthcare quality. Stroke is a major complication following cardiac surgery. Our study aimed to evaluate the frequency and predictors of 30-day unplanned hospital readmission after cardiac surgeries and to evaluate the impact of perioperative stroke on readmission. METHODS: Surgical discharge records spanning the years of 2008 through 2011 were analyzed utilizing California State Inpatient Database. International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes and Clinical Classification Software (CCS) codes were used to identify surgeries and variables of interest. Surgical records were then followed up for 30 days through linking admission records. Perioperative stroke was defined as brain infarction of ischemic or hemorrhagic etiology that occurred during or within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics associated with increased readmission rates were female gender, age above 65, non-white race, lower income, and increased number of comorbidities. Among 199,617 hospitalizations for cardiac surgeries, 1,817 (0.91%) patients developed perioperative stroke. The rate of readmission in perioperative stroke patients was 21.89%. They had a longer length of hospital stay and their discharge was vastly non-routine (84%). Our univariate analysis yielded significant association between stroke and readmission rates (odds ratio: 1.82, 95% confidence interval: 1.63 - 2.04). This association failed to remain significant upon controlling for other variables in our multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Baseline patient characteristics and perioperative complications are significant predictors of readmission. More than one in five patients who develop a stroke after cardiac surgery are readmitted to the hospital within 30 days of discharge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".