Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ao celebrarmos o centenário de Paulo Freire, somos impulsionados a refletir sobre o seu legado. Em tempos de pandemia e de crescentes ataques contra a democracia e a justiça social, vemos a pedagogia crítica Freireana como uma possibilidade de compreender a realidade atual. Os conceitos Freireanos de situação-limite, ato-limite e inédito-viável proporciona lentes fundamentais na compreensão do mundo aos engajados nas lutas por processos democráticos mais justos. Analisamos a trágica história dos pensionatos indígenas no Canadá como situações-limite a serem superadas. As descobertas recentes de centenas de covas de crianças indígenas em torno desses pensionatos canadenses precisam ser confrontadas de forma coletiva na criação de atos-limite que possibilitam sonhar inéditos-viáveis e desenterrar a verdade e a busca ativa por reconciliação entre os povos indígenas e não-indígenas. Terminamos esse artigo com uma chamada à celebr-AÇÃO em que honramos o legado de Freire com ações que visam a humanização e a busca por um mundo mais justo e igualitário.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".