MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210400834 · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28397-3

Author Correction: Subpolar North Atlantic western boundary density anomalies and the Meridional Overturning Circulation

2022· erratum· en· W4210400834 on OpenAlexaff
Feili Li, M. Susan Lozier, Sheldon Bacon, Amy S. Bower, Stuart A. Cunningham, M. Femke de Jong, Brad deYoung, Neil Fraser, Nora Fried, Guoqi Han, N. Penny Holliday, James Holte, Loïc Houpert, Mark Inall, William E. Johns, Sam Jones, Clare Johnson, Johannes Karstensen, Isabela Le Bras, Pascale Lherminier, Xiaopei Lin, Herlé Mercier, Marilena Oltmanns, Astrid Pacini, Tillys Petit, Robert S. Pickart, D. Rayner, Fiammetta Straneo, Virginie Thierry, Martin Visbeck, Igor Yashayaev, Chun Zhou

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2022
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of OceanographyFisheries and Oceans CanadaMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsShutdown of thermohaline circulationCirculation (fluid dynamics)Thermohaline circulationGeologyBoundary (topology)ClimatologyOceanographyNorth Atlantic Deep WaterPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The original version of this Article contained an error in the caption of Figure 2, in which the total Ekman transport was incorrectly listed as −0.7 ± 0.01 Sv. The correct value is −1.5 ± 0.02 Sv. The corrected article also has an updated data product link in Reference 56. These have been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.030
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.239

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.030
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207