Learning white matter subject‐specific segmentation from structural MRI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Mapping brain white matter (WM) is essential for building an understanding of brain anatomy and function. Tractography-based methods derived from diffusion-weighted MRI (dMRI) are the principal tools for investigating WM. These procedures rely on time-consuming dMRI acquisitions that may not always be available, especially for legacy or time-constrained studies. To address this problem, we aim to generate WM tracts from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) image by deep learning. METHODS: Following recently proposed innovations in structural anatomical segmentation, we evaluate the feasibility of training multiply spatial localized convolution neural networks to learn context from fixed spatial patches from structural MRI on standard template. We focus on six widely used dMRI tractography algorithms (TractSeg, RecoBundles, XTRACT, Tracula, automated fiber quantification (AFQ), and AFQclipped) and train 125 U-Net models to learn these techniques from 3870 T1-weighted images from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging, the Human Connectome Project S1200 release, and scans acquired at Vanderbilt University. RESULTS: The proposed framework identifies fiber bundles with high agreement against tractography-based pathways with a median Dice coefficient from 0.62 to 0.87 on a test cohort, achieving improved subject-specific accuracy when compared to population atlas-based methods. We demonstrate the generalizability of the proposed framework on three externally available datasets. CONCLUSIONS: We show that patch-wise convolutional neural network can achieve robust bundle segmentation from T1w. We envision the use of this framework for visualizing the expected course of WM pathways when dMRI is not available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".