MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210419974 · doi:10.1016/j.radcr.2021.12.065

Successful embolization of a congenital intra-hepatic arterioportal fistula in a neonate with the MVP Microvascular Plug system (MVP-3Q)

2022· article· en· W4210419974 on OpenAlexaff
Maria Gladkikh, Dimitri A. Parra

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiology Case Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAbdominal vascular conditions and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFistulaRadiologyEmbolizationArteriovenous fistulaOcclusionAngiographyArterySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This case report describes a neonate with an antenatally diagnosed vascular anomaly of the liver. Ultrasound at birth confirmed an arterioportal fistula communicating the left hepatic artery and an anterior branch of the right portal vein. Computer tomography angiography on day 7 of life redemonstrated the arterioportal fistula and defined the vascular anatomy for potential treatment. Transarterial embolization of the arterioportal fistula was performed at 3 weeks of life using an MVP Microvascular Plug System 3Q (Reverse Medical Corp, Irvine, CA, USA). Intra-procedural angiography showed successful occlusion of the fistula, patency of the portal vein with hepatopetal flow, and patency of the hepatic artery with no signs of arterial or venous thrombosis. There were no intra- or post-procedure complications. Multiple follow-up ultrasounds at 1-13 months showed stable occlusion of the embolized fistula with no evidence of recanalization, with the patient having a normal life and no sequelae. This case illustrates a successful novel approach to manage the rare condition of a solitary hepatic arterioportal fistula in a neonate using the MVP system. Current literature on congenital arterioportal fistulas and the MVP system is reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiology Case ReportsSame topicAbdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207