MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210422429 · doi:10.3386/w29712

A Theory of Cash Flow-Based Financing with Distress Resolution

2022· report· en· W4210422429 on OpenAlexaff
Barney Hartman‐Glaser, Simon Mayer, Konstantin Milbradt

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Bureau of Economic Research · 2022
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTransportation and Mobility Innovations
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCash flowAsset (computer security)FinanceBusinessEconomicsComputer scienceComputer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider a firm with infrequent access to capital markets, continuous access to costly intermediary financing, and a cost of holding cash. In the optimal renegotiation-proof contract, the intermediary absorbs a share of cash-flow risk. This share increases as firm depletes its internal cash, suggesting an overlapping pecking order. If the firm runs out of cash, it liquidates if the cash-flow is too risky, otherwise the intermediary extends financing that resembles either private equity or collateralized debt. The model helps explain trends in financial intermediation, such as the rise of private equity and the use of collateralized debt.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.204
GPT teacher head0.431
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNational Bureau of Economic ResearchSame topicTransportation and Mobility InnovationsFrench-language works237,207