MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210427377 · doi:10.33425/2639-9474.1191

Avoidable Hospitalizations in Ages 0-17. What do Current Information Flows tell us?

2021· article· en· W4210427377 on OpenAlexaff
Silvano Piffer, Rizzello Roberto, Marta Betta, Lauriola Anna Lina, B. Monica

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing & Primary Care · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicChild and Adolescent Health
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidenceChildbirthMedicineHospital dischargeDemographyHealth careAge groupsPediatricsFamily medicinePregnancyPolitical scienceIntensive care medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Potentially avoidable hospitalizations can be used as indicators of access and quality of primary care. Several criteria are reported in the literature to identify these cases. We have used the criteria proposed by the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality integrated by three further conditions monitored in Italy by S. Anna Institute of Pisa and the National Outcome Plan. The study reports on the characteristics of potentially avoidable hospitalizations, in the age group 0-17 years in the province of Trento – Italy, in the year 2018. The study also explores the possible role of some maternal and perinatal factors. Materials and Methods: The cases of interest were extracted from the computerized archive of hospital discharges relating to subjects residing in the province of Trento, for the age group 0-17 years, considering both discharges from provincial institutions and that from institutions outside the province of Trento. We followed the selection and exclusion criteria indicated by the reference institutions. Many socio-demographic and care variables were considered among those present in the hospital discharge form. The hospitalization rate was calculated for all the cases identified and for the individual conditions. The hospitalization rate by age group was also calculated. We compared the hospitalization rate in Italians vs. foreigners and in relation to the area of residence. By linking the hospital discharge archive with that of the Childbirth, we explored the role of some maternal-perinatal factors. Results: In 2018, 413 potentially avoidable hospital admissions were identified in the 0-17 age group representing 6.8% of the total hospitalizations. Admissions for tonsillectomy represent almost 60% of cases. Males predominate over females. The 0-4 age group comprises 43.5% of hospitalizations, 86.2% of cases are Italian citizens, 19.8% reside in an urban area and 80.2% in a rural area. 57.0% of the total cases have been hospitalized in day hospital/day surgery; urgent hospitalizations represent 68.7% of cases and only 11.4% of hospitalizations take place over the weekend. All cases are discharged to their home for an overall average hospital stay of 3.6 days. Hospitalization takes on a decreasing trend with increasing age. A higher hospitalization rate emerges in foreigners and also in residents in rural areas. There is an excess of subjects with low qualifications among the mothers of cases with avoidable hospitalization. Discussion: The use of hospital data to describe the quality of primary care is widespread although it has various limitations. One limitation is represented by the quality of hospital data and the other by the fact that hospital data does not inform us about non-medical aspects that may have a relevant importance on improper hospitalization. To explore these hidden aspects, it would be advisable to integrate hospital data with an audit involving all stakeholders. With all the limitations of the case, the results of our study give a satisfactory picture with respect to avoidable hospitalizations in the age of 0-17 in the province of Trento. An analysis of the criteria for using tonsillectomy would allow a control of most cases. More generally, a homogenization of the organization of primary care and of the hospital-territory relationship could be useful.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing & Primary CareSame topicChild and Adolescent HealthFrench-language works237,207