MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210438730 · doi:10.1109/cdc45484.2021.9683164

A Low-power Multi High-Gain Observer Design for State Estimation in Nonlinear Systems

2021· article· en· W4210438730 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Observer (physics)Stability (learning theory)Nonlinear systemSensitivity (control systems)High-gain antennaComputer sciencePower (physics)Electric power systemNoise (video)Reduction (mathematics)State observerEngineeringMathematicsElectronic engineeringPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a modification of the multi high-gain observer (MHGO) that uses multiple low-power observers with gains powered up to the order of 2 instead of n, regardless of the order of the system. It is proved that the same features of MHGO, like the existence of ideal state estimation, stability and peaking reduction, remain valid for low power MHGO. Numerical simulation demonstrates the properties of the MHGO design. It also shows reduced sensitivity to high-frequency measurement noise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.900
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it