MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210440518 · doi:10.15593/perm.kipf/2021.4.05

State Regulation of Military Production at Mining Plants of the Urals in the Second Quarter of the 19th Century

2021· article· en· W4210440518 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnologos · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies on Spain
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtilleryReignJurisdictionState (computer science)Military scienceQuarter (Canadian coin)LegislatureOrder (exchange)Operations researchCommand and controlLawEngineeringManagementPolitical scienceHistoryPoliticsArchaeologyBusinessComputer scienceEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The activities of the military and naval authorities in organizing military production in the mining industry of the Urals in the second quarter of the 19thcentury have been analyzed in the article. Despite a large number of studies on the history of military management mainly devoted to the period of the reign of Alexander I the organization of the military economy in historiography has not been given sufficient attention. The researchers did not consider the issues of state regulation of the military order at the mining plants of the Urals. The author has made an attempt to analyze the changes in the structure of the economic management of the military and naval departments during the reform of the state apparatus during the reign of Nicholas I, to show their role in organizing the military order at the mining plants of the Urals. The main sources of the research were the legislative and normative acts regulating the organization of the activities of military and naval control bodies, the procedure for manufacturing and accepting military products from mining plants. Also involved are archival materials from the military command and control bodies concentrated in the Federal archives. In the process of analyzing the factual materialhistorical-genetic and problem-chronological research methods were used. As a result the author concludes that the central bodies of military and naval control played the key role in organizing the military order. In particular, the leadership of the artillery department was under the joint jurisdiction of the Artillery Department and the General Feldzheichmeister. The artillery department of the War Ministry was responsible for supplying the army with weapons. It was in charge of determining the volume of the military order monitoring the implementation of military orders and the quality of products through the artillery inspectors located at the mining plants. In the structure of the naval department in the second quarter of the 19th centurythe reorganization took place as well. Due to this reorganization a unified department was created, headed by the Naval Ministry. The mining plants of the Urals supplied shells and metals for the fleet. The author stated that the Artillery Department was responsible for the supply of weapons for the fleet in the structure of the ministry, and the procurement of metals was under the jurisdiction of the Shipbuilding Department

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTechnologosSame topicHistorical Studies on SpainFrench-language works237,207