MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210442373 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2020.0196

Great Plains Literature by Linda Pratt

2020· article· en· W4210442373 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Modern Language Review · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerTrilogyNarrativeHistorySettlement (finance)Art historySociologyLiteratureArtGender studiesComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MLR, .,   is defined loosely here, but this work will surely make a profound intervention in debates both queer and literary. Bateman’s study itself is a ‘narrative vessel’ (p. ), bringing forth a story of queer survival that demands to be heard. e confidence of series editors Kevin J. H. Dettmar and Mark Wollaeger in describing Bateman as ‘a canny reader of queer theory and a formidable theorist in his own right’ (p. vii) is well placed. e Modernist Art of Queer Survival is an invigorating book, and one that will endure. Queer theory has a future, and this is the kind of work that makes scholars want to be a part of it. U  Y H R Great Plains Literature. By L P. (Discovering the Great Plains) Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. . iv+ pp. $.; £.. ISBN – –––. In Great Plains Literature Linda Pratt offers a survey of the region’s writers that is both compact and in-depth, at least concerning the aspects and authors on which Pratt has chosen to focus. e book is, by design, easily accessible to the non-academic, but even someone who studies Great Plains literature is bound to discover a few interesting titles. Aer an Introduction with an inciteful overview of the region, the book features six chapters organized chronologically: the forced removal of Native Americans; homesteading as viewed through O. E. Rolvaag’s trilogy; the end of the settlement period and Willa Cather’s novels; the Great Depression on the plains; a chapter featuring city settings; and, finally, a look at contemporary authors. e critical strength of the book is that, in addressing a region that is highly prone to myth, it completely resists nostalgia in its view of the literature. Instead of focusing on hearty folks and wholesome values, as many do when assessing the region, Pratt’s analysis of the literature takes on painful histories: Native American genocide, the widespread failure of homesteading, closed-mindedness that extends to violent racial prejudice, and damage to the environment. As Pratt writes in the Introduction: ‘is study will reveal to us both the pioneering struggles needed for these territories to become bona fides of their nation and the legacy of that past as it plays out today in a contemporary society that wants both to forget and to remember’ (p. ). Indeed, Pratt also engages with literature that highlights the valiant struggle of pioneers and the profound connection plains residents feel with home. Overall, the body of Great Plains literature that Pratt has chosen to assemble presents an even-handed, realistic view of the region and remains vigilantly tied to historical context. Some unique features of the book include the chapter on literature of plains cities, a setting not oen acknowledged. e work of Tillie Olson features prominently here. In the Great Depression chapter Pratt takes an in-depth look at Lois Phillips Hudson’s excellent though underrated novel e Bones of Plenty (). As Pratt notes, Hudson’s novel is oen overshadowed by Steinbeck’s e Grapes of Wrath but offers a more nuanced, complex look at the period. Pratt also includes  Reviews Canadian literature throughout the book and resists treating the Great Plains as a solely American region. Margaret Laurence’s acclaimed novel e Diviners (), set in Canada, receives particular attention in the section on contemporary writers. Flaws in Pratt’s survey are limited, but one may concern the chapter on Willa Cather. Pratt’s criticisms of Cather are valid—the problematic nature of her male narrators and, especially, the fact that her plains are ‘more mythic than historical’ (p. ). Pratt ultimately concludes of Cather: ‘It is important, but not easy, to see in her novels of the West what was once there that is lost, as well as what was never there at all’ (p. ). And this is an astute evaluation; however, there does not seem to be enough emphasis on the value of critically approaching this mythic depiction of the region. Cather’s novels put the Great Plains on the literary map, but without much praise for her considerable talent as a writer, a reader of Great Plains Literature might not feel encouraged to pursue these fundamental...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it