MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W4210442373 · doi:10.1353/mlr.2020.0196

Great Plains Literature by Linda Pratt

2020· article· en· W4210442373 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aaron LaDuke

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Modern Language Review · 2020
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueAmerican Environmental and Regional History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQueerTrilogyNarrativeHistorySettlement (finance)Art historySociologyLiteratureArtGender studiesComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

MLR, .,   is defined loosely here, but this work will surely make a profound intervention in debates both queer and literary. Bateman’s study itself is a ‘narrative vessel’ (p. ), bringing forth a story of queer survival that demands to be heard. e confidence of series editors Kevin J. H. Dettmar and Mark Wollaeger in describing Bateman as ‘a canny reader of queer theory and a formidable theorist in his own right’ (p. vii) is well placed. e Modernist Art of Queer Survival is an invigorating book, and one that will endure. Queer theory has a future, and this is the kind of work that makes scholars want to be a part of it. U  Y H R Great Plains Literature. By L P. (Discovering the Great Plains) Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. . iv+ pp. $.; £.. ISBN – –––. In Great Plains Literature Linda Pratt offers a survey of the region’s writers that is both compact and in-depth, at least concerning the aspects and authors on which Pratt has chosen to focus. e book is, by design, easily accessible to the non-academic, but even someone who studies Great Plains literature is bound to discover a few interesting titles. Aer an Introduction with an inciteful overview of the region, the book features six chapters organized chronologically: the forced removal of Native Americans; homesteading as viewed through O. E. Rolvaag’s trilogy; the end of the settlement period and Willa Cather’s novels; the Great Depression on the plains; a chapter featuring city settings; and, finally, a look at contemporary authors. e critical strength of the book is that, in addressing a region that is highly prone to myth, it completely resists nostalgia in its view of the literature. Instead of focusing on hearty folks and wholesome values, as many do when assessing the region, Pratt’s analysis of the literature takes on painful histories: Native American genocide, the widespread failure of homesteading, closed-mindedness that extends to violent racial prejudice, and damage to the environment. As Pratt writes in the Introduction: ‘is study will reveal to us both the pioneering struggles needed for these territories to become bona fides of their nation and the legacy of that past as it plays out today in a contemporary society that wants both to forget and to remember’ (p. ). Indeed, Pratt also engages with literature that highlights the valiant struggle of pioneers and the profound connection plains residents feel with home. Overall, the body of Great Plains literature that Pratt has chosen to assemble presents an even-handed, realistic view of the region and remains vigilantly tied to historical context. Some unique features of the book include the chapter on literature of plains cities, a setting not oen acknowledged. e work of Tillie Olson features prominently here. In the Great Depression chapter Pratt takes an in-depth look at Lois Phillips Hudson’s excellent though underrated novel e Bones of Plenty (). As Pratt notes, Hudson’s novel is oen overshadowed by Steinbeck’s e Grapes of Wrath but offers a more nuanced, complex look at the period. Pratt also includes  Reviews Canadian literature throughout the book and resists treating the Great Plains as a solely American region. Margaret Laurence’s acclaimed novel e Diviners (), set in Canada, receives particular attention in the section on contemporary writers. Flaws in Pratt’s survey are limited, but one may concern the chapter on Willa Cather. Pratt’s criticisms of Cather are valid—the problematic nature of her male narrators and, especially, the fact that her plains are ‘more mythic than historical’ (p. ). Pratt ultimately concludes of Cather: ‘It is important, but not easy, to see in her novels of the West what was once there that is lost, as well as what was never there at all’ (p. ). And this is an astute evaluation; however, there does not seem to be enough emphasis on the value of critically approaching this mythic depiction of the region. Cather’s novels put the Great Plains on the literary map, but without much praise for her considerable talent as a writer, a reader of Great Plains Literature might not feel encouraged to pursue these fundamental...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,029
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,097

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,003
Communication savante0,0060,005
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0290,015

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,213
Écart entre enseignants0,205 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2020
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Modern Language ReviewMême sujetAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryTravaux en français237 207