Predicting personalised risk of disability worsening in multiple sclerosis with machine learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Multiple sclerosis is a heterogeneous disease with an unpredictable course. We applied machine learning to generate individualised risk scores of disability worsening and stratify patients into subgroups with different prognosis. Clinical data and MRI scans from published randomised clinical trials in patients with relapsing-remitting and progressive MS were divided into training (n=5,483) and external validation data sets (n=2,668). We processed brain MRI scans to obtain 18 measures for lobar grey matter, deep grey matter and lesion volumes, and T1-/T2-weighted ratio of the normal-appearing white matter regions. We developed a machine learning model, called subpopulation risk stratification (SunRiSe), that combines multi-parametric clinical and MRI data to estimate individualised risk scores and stratify patients into subgroups on the basis of this risk; in particular, we entered MRI measures, the Expanded Disability Status Scale, age and gender to generate risk scores of disability worsening (i.e., the time to confirmed disability worsening). Based on SunRiSe risk scores, high-, medium-, and low-risk subpopulations were defined at study entry. We assessed whether selecting patients at high risk of disability worsening reduces sample size compared to when all risk groups were sampled together. In both the training and external validation data sets, SunRiSe-stratified patients in three groups associated with different levels of risk of disability worsening. In the external validation data set, patients at high risk were mainly progressive MS and had more disability events compared to those at medium-risk (hazard ratio [HR]=1.34, p<0.0001) and low-risk (HR=1.51, p<0.0001). At study entry, male gender, older age, higher lesion load, higher disability, lower lobar cortical grey matter, lower normal-appearing white matter T1/T2 ratio and lower deep grey matter volumes, were the most important variables in defining the SunRiSe risk score. The inclusion of patients predicted to be at high risk, reduced (i) duration of an event-driven trial by an average of 4.5 months (±2.1 months); (ii) the number of participants in a randomised trial by approximately 200, with 80% statistical power to detect a 30% treatment effect. Machine learning provides a personalised risk score that can identify patients who have the greatest risk of disability worsening and therefore should be treated with the most effective medications and monitored more closely. Risk stratification allows the enrichment of clinical trials with patients more likely to worsen, and thereby reduces trial duration and sample size.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".