Racial and Generational Issues in Competitive Cycle Racing in Durban in the Closing Decades of the Twentieth Century: A Case Study of the Triangle Cycling Club
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Segregated sport was a source of bitter conflict in apartheid South Africa. This paper focuses on cycle sport in apartheid-era Natal, concentrating on the circumstances which led to the rise and ultimately to the demise of one specific multiracial Durban cycling club: the ‘Triangle Cycling Club.’ Based on a mixed research methodology, it explores the impact on the micro-level of the state’s changing sports policies on local cycle sport over the last quarter of the twentieth century. It examines the effects which these had as they coincided with the sudden unanticipated influx into cycle sport of veteran competitors from endurance sports. It explores the philosophy on which Triangle CC was founded, identifies the sporting achievements of the club’s leading members and details the great ‘Adventure Tour’ to Cape Town in 1991. Finally, it reflects on the demise of the club and of traditional cycle sport in the 1990s as enthusiasm for new forms of cycling such as ‘mountain biking’ and mass-participation ‘sportives’ reached new heights.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".