Intrinsic dynamics and topography of sensory input systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The brain is continuously bombarded by external stimuli, which are processed in different input systems. The intrinsic features of these sensory input systems remain yet unclear. Investigating topography and dynamics of input systems is the goal of our study in order to better understand the intrinsic features that shape their neural processing. Using a functional magnetic resonance imaging dataset, we measured neural topography and dynamics of the input systems during rest and task states. Neural dynamics were probed by scale-free activity, measured with the power-law exponent (PLE), as well as by order/disorder as measured with sample entropy (SampEn). Our main findings during both rest and task states are: 1) differences in neural dynamics (PLE, SampEn) between regions within each of the three sensory input systems 2) differences in topography and dynamics among the three input systems; 3) PLE and SampEn correlate and, as demonstrated in simulation, show non-linear relationship in the critical range of PLE; 4) scale-free activity during rest mediates the transition of SampEn from rest to task as probed in a mediation model. We conclude that the sensory input systems are characterized by their intrinsic topographic and dynamic organization which, through scale-free activity, modulates their input processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".