MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210487336 · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-27988-4

Orbital stability analysis and photometric characterization of the second Earth Trojan asteroid 2020 XL5

2022· article· en· W4210487336 on OpenAlexaff
T. Santana-Ros, M. Micheli, Laura Faggioli, Ramona Cennamo, Maxime Devogèle, A. Álvarez-Candal, Dagmara Oszkiewicz, Oliver Mauricio Esguerra Ramírez, P.-Y. Liu, Paula Gabriela Benavídez, Adriano Campo Bagatín, E. Christensen, R. J. Wainscoat, R. Weryk, L. Fraga, César Briceño, L. Conversi

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryIntegrated Electronics Engineering Center, Binghamton UniversityEuropean Regional Development FundScience and Technology Facilities CouncilHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversitySLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryInstituto de Astrofísica de AndalucíaFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de JaneiroNuclear Safety and Security CommissionNarodowym Centrum NaukiCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y TecnológicasConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoKavli Institute for Cosmological Physics, University of ChicagoGeneralitat ValencianaDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftCenter for Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Ohio State UniversityUniversity of SussexMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y UniversidadesAgencia Estatal de InvestigaciónYale UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthUniversity of ToledoUniversity of California, Santa CruzUniversitat de BarcelonaOhio State UniversityInstitut de Física d'Altes EnergiesNational Centre for Supercomputing ApplicationsEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationUniversity College LondonUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignMichigan State UniversityNorthern Arizona UniversityMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e InovaçãoLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryInstitut de Ciències del CosmosFinanciadora de Estudos e ProjetosUniversity of PennsylvaniaMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónEuropean CommissionU.S. Department of EnergyFermilabNational Science Foundation
KeywordsTrojanAsteroidAstrobiologyCharacterization (materials science)Earth (classical element)AstronomyNear-Earth objectPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Trojan asteroids are small bodies orbiting around the L 4 or L 5 Lagrangian points of a Sun-planet system. Due to their peculiar orbits, they provide key constraints to the Solar System evolution models. Despite numerous dedicated observational efforts in the last decade, asteroid 2010 TK 7 has been the only known Earth Trojan thus far. Here we confirm that the recently discovered 2020 XL 5 is the second transient Earth Trojan known. To study its orbit, we used archival data from 2012 to 2019 and observed the object in 2021 from three ground-based observatories. Our study of its orbital stability shows that 2020 XL 5 will remain in L 4 for at least 4 000 years. With a photometric analysis we estimate its absolute magnitude to be $${H}_{r}=18.5{8}_{-0.15}^{+0.16}$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>H</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>r</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>18.5</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>8</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.16</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> , and color indices suggestive of a C-complex taxonomy. Assuming an albedo of 0.06 ± 0.03, we obtain a diameter of 1.18 ± 0.08 km, larger than the first known Earth Trojan asteroid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207