Exposition à la violence conjugale : regards de jeunes adultes sur leur parcours de vie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Population surveys involving North American youth suggest that between 14% and 19% of young people are likely to have been exposed to intimate partner violence during childhood. Such violence and its aftermath can have a significant impact on the life course trajectories of young adults, although this impact can also be tempered or aggravated by other life experiences. Based on semi-structured interviews with 35 young adults between the ages of 18 and 25 who were exposed to intimate partner violence in childhood or adolescence, this qualitative study aims to learn more about the connections between such exposure and other life course experiences. An adapted Life History Calendar was used during data collection. In addition to highlighting the superposition of study participants’ life course trajectories, analysis of the data also demonstrates the importance of agency in determining how these trajectories influence each other. Studies on exposure to intimate partner violence therefore need to consider not only the life contexts of the young people involved, but also the meaning these individuals ascribe to their experiences and to the actions they decide to take.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".