Reinforcement-Learning-Aided Safe Planning for Aerial Robots to Collect Data in Dynamic Environments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We study the data collection problem in an Internet of Things (IoT) network where an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) is utilized to aggregate data from a set of IoT devices. We formulate the scheduling and path planning problems for the UAV. The goal of the scheduling problem is to find the sequence of nodes that the UAV will visit to complete the data collection task in the shortest possible time, ensuring that it does not run out of energy during its mission. We express this problem as a mixed-integer nonlinear problem and propose an efficient algorithm to solve the aforementioned NP-hard problem in polynomial time. Path planning problem aims to find a collision-free path for the UAV. While the state-of-the-art schemes have focused on solving the path planning problem in static environments, we study the problem in a dynamic environment with moving obstacles. We develop an algorithm that works on both static and dynamic environments. Our method combines deep reinforcement learning (RL) with graph-based global path planning algorithms to find a collision-free path for the UAV. One important advantage of our RL-based method over the existing studies is its map independency, which allows us to transform the agent’s learning from one environment to another. Via simulation studies, we show that our method is significantly effective in improving the safety of the path planning algorithms in dynamic environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".