MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210503505 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000200036

Teaching Video NeuroImage: Unilateral Gaze Palsy With Nystagmus and Facial Weakness

2022· article· en· W4210503505 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOphthalmology and Eye Disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPalsyFacial weaknessDiplopiaWeaknessGazeFacial nerveNystagmusEye movement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A 27-year-old man presented with 6 months of binocular horizontal diplopia worsening over 2 weeks. Examination (Video 1) showed near complete inability to look to the left with left-beating nystagmus. He was orthotropic on alignment testing in primary gaze. There was mild left facial weakness with nasolabial fold flattening. MRI revealed left pontine cavernoma with small area of acute hemorrhage (Figure). Horizontal gaze palsy with ipsilateral facial weakness localizes to the sixth nerve nucleus and encircling facial nerve fascicles1; esotropia is minimal unlike fascicular sixth nerve palsy. Involvement of the horizontal gaze integrator/nucleus prepositus hypoglossi accounts for horizontal nystagmus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.089
Threshold uncertainty score0.500

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurologySame topicOphthalmology and Eye DisordersFrench-language works237,207