MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210505216 · doi:10.1109/tcsii.2022.3148228

An Area-Efficient FPGA Implementation of a Real-Time Multi-Class Classifier for Binary Images

2022· article· en· W4210505216 on OpenAlexaff
Narges Attarmoghaddam, Kin Fun Li

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express Briefs · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceLocal binary patternsArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Classifier (UML)Support vector machineNormalization (sociology)Feature extractionExtractorBinary numberField-programmable gate arrayBinary classificationImage processingContextual image classificationHistogramComputer visionImage (mathematics)Computer hardwareMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Developing image classification modules in embedded systems is a complex task due to the limited resources available. In this brief, a multi-class image classifier using HOG feature extractor and SVM classifier is proposed for binary images. The novelty of the proposed system is applying two steps of binarization to the HOG technique to improve processing speed and area efficiency. First, HOG features are extracted from binary images to simplify the feature extraction process. Second, block normalization of the HOG is replaced with binarization to reduce hardware resource utilization. Compared to a similar existing work, our system speeds up the classification process while utilizing fewer hardware resources, with an 11.4% higher classification accuracy using the same setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems II Express BriefsSame topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207