Hibridez genérica y unidad artística en la comedia de santos: el proceso de hibridación en «Lo fingido verdadero»
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo explora el fenómeno de la hibridación genérica en una peculiar comedia hagiográfica de Lope de Vega, Lo fingido verdadero. Estudia de qué modo se integran en ella numerosos elementos de naturaleza heterogénea dentro de una estructura dramática móvil, en la que se combinan rasgos de drama histórico, comedia de capa y espada, comedia de enredo amoroso, tragedia y comedia de santos. Lope logra conferir unidad artística al conjunto de personajes y de acontecimientos de distinto género mediante un tema articulador de los tres actos (la metáfora del theatrum mundi), el juego de contraposición entre dos personajes protagonistas, y una red de recurrencias, simetrías, contrastes y símbolos (laurel y pan). Se tienen en cuenta la relación de la obra con sus fuentes y la comparación con otras comedias hagiográficas de Lope o con otros dramas españoles sobre la figura de San Ginés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.018 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".