MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210520686 · doi:10.2196/36426

Evaluation of the Nutrition Surveillance System, Sana’a City, Yemen, 2021: Cross-sectional Study

2022· article· en· W4210520686 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sumia Abbas Alturki, Abdulfattah Al-Mahdi, Nosiba Al-Sharafy, Yasser Ghaleb

Bibliographic record

VenueIproceedings · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnvironmental healthMedicineMalnutritionPublic healthCross-sectional studyPublic health surveillanceStrengths and weaknessesDeveloping countryNursingPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Malnutrition remains one of the most common causes of morbidity and mortality among children in low- and middle-income countries. It is one of the important problems that showed an increasing incidence in Yemen. The Nutrition Surveillance System started in 2018 as a pilot in five governorates to ensure that difficulties of public health importance are monitored efficiently. Objective This study aims to assess its usefulness and the performance of the system attributes, and to identify strengths and weaknesses to make recommendations for improvement. Methods The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s updated guidelines for the evaluation of public health surveillance were used to evaluate the Nutrition Surveillance System in Sana’a City. Qualitative and quantitative attributes were measured through desk review and in-depth interviews with stakeholders from different levels by using a semistructured questionnaire for collected data. The percent mean of total scores was used for the final rank of the performance as very poor (<40%), poor (40%<60%), average (60%<80%), good (80%<90%), and excellent (≥90%). Epi Info version 7.2 was used for data entry and analysis. Results The Nutrition Surveillance System was found to be useful and flexible, with overall scores of 100% and 80%, respectively, and the overall system performance was average (76%). The highest attribute score was 83% for simplicity, and the lowest score was 67% for stability. Simplicity and acceptability at the governorate and district levels were good, but at the health facilities level, they were average. Timeliness of report and completeness of forms and data were 100% and 95%, respectively. The main strength of the Nutrition Surveillance System was continuous expansion in opening new health facilities and that the quality of data was strong with updated databases. Conclusions The Nutrition Surveillance System in Sana’a City was found to be useful and met its main objective. Overall levels of system performance were average. Regular training for health staff at the health facilities and gradual replacement of donors with government funds are recommended.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIproceedingsSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207