Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 2010, l’économie canadienne a connu une reprise relativement forte et le taux de croissance du PIB du pays en termes réels a retrouvé son niveau antérieur à la crise. Comme dans la plupart des pays membres de l’OCDE, le rythme de la croissance a ralenti en 2011 en raison principalement de la nouvelle zone de turbulences traversée par les marchés de capitaux, liée à la crise de la dette souveraine européenne et à l’érosion de la confiance qu’elle a entraînée au niveau mondial (graphique 1A). On estime que pour 2011 le déficit budgétaire des administrations publiques a été ramené à 4.5 % du PIB et que leur dette brute a légèrement reculé pour s’établir à 83.8 % du PIB (graphiques 1B et 1C). Avec l’atténuation des risques à l’échelle mondiale, les perspectives de l’économie canadienne se sont améliorées. L’OCDE prévoit pour 2012
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.390 | 0.141 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".