MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210538624 · doi:10.4236/ajibm.2022.121006

The Effect of COVID-19 on International Trade: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa

2022· article· en· W4210538624 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Espoir Lukau Matezo, Boaz Mingiedi Matondo

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Industrial and Business Management · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Quarter (Canadian coin)EconomicsInternational trade2019-20 coronavirus outbreakDevelopment economicsSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)PandemicAgricultureInternational economicsDeveloping countryBusinessEconomic growthDiseaseGeographyMedicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this paper is to present evidence for the effect of coronavirus disease 2019 on international trade. Accordingly, we investigate trade among Sub-Saharan African countries during the first quarter of 2020. The disease problem of COVID-19 is measured based on the number of cases and deaths. The findings of this study show that the COVID-19 problem in exporting countries has a significantly negative effect on trade and positive significance in importing countries. This negative effect of exporters’ COVID-19 crisis is seen in exports from developing countries. The COVID-19 problem in an exporter’s neighboring nation has a positive impact on its exports. Importers’ COVID-19 problem has positive effects on trade in the agricultural industry, while exporters’ COVID-19 problem has adverse effects, for the most part, in the textile, footwear, and plastic industries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.865
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Industrial and Business ManagementSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207