MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210548144 · doi:10.4000/archeomed.35683

Saint-Michel (Aisne). Abbaye Saint-Michel

2020· article· fr· W4210548144 on OpenAlexaff
Thierry Galmiche

Bibliographic record

VenueArchéologie médiévale · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European History and Architecture
Canadian institutionsCégep de l'Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSAINTMichel foucaultArtPhilosophyArt historyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La Ville de Saint-Michel, en partenariat avec la Drac Hauts-de-France, a entrepris un projet de mise en valeur des abords de l’abbaye Saint-Michel (parvis de l’église, logis des hôtes et jardins attenants), à l’origine du présent diagnostic archéologique. Un monastère est fondé par Hersent en 945 en un lieu où préexistait un oratoire qui aurait été érigé par Ursmer au viie s. Incendiée en 1170, l’abbaye est reconstruite à partir de la fin de ce siècle. Elle fait l’objet, à partir de 1598, d’u...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.199
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1990.039

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchéologie médiévaleSame topicMedieval European History and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207