MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4210563571 · doi:10.2196/36514

Evaluation of the National Electronic Disease Surveillance System Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic in Elsahel District, Cairo Governorate, Egypt, 2020

2022· article· en· W4210563571 on OpenAlex
Neven Girgis, Wessam Elnahry, Salma Afifi, Sahar El Shourbagy, Hanaa Abu Elsood, Alaa Eid

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueIproceedings · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisease surveillancePandemicMedicinePublic health surveillancePublic healthPopulationInterviewEnvironmental healthMedical emergencyDiseaseCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Infectious disease (medical specialty)Political scienceNursing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background The Egypt National Disease Surveillance is a routine system established in 2002. The system electronically reports on 41 infectious diseases including COVID-19. Reporting sites include all Egyptian governorates, districts, governmental infectious disease hospitals, and primary health units. Surveillance is essential during the pandemic to detect cases early, describe the epidemiology of health problems, guide priority setting, and plan and evaluate public health policy and strategies. Objective This study aims to evaluate the surveillance system during the pandemic to assess its effectiveness in achieving its objectives and to find and fill the gaps. Methods The evaluation was performed using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines. A structured questionnaire was used to evaluate the qualitative attributes including simplicity, flexibility, and acceptability through interviewing surveillance teams at the central level, health directorate, and Sahel district. Quantitative attributes, including completeness, timeliness, and predictive positive value, were performed using COVID-19 surveillance data of Sahel district in March-December 2020. Data were assessed for completeness and accuracy. The usefulness of surveillance was assessed in terms of achieving its objectives and use of data. Results Of 33 respondents, 90% thought that the system was simple, and 77% thought it was acceptable; work overload reduced the acceptability rate. The system is funded by the Ministry of Health and Population and was operational 53% of the time due to connectivity problems. The system was flexible when adapting to include COVID-19 in a short time with minimal cost. It is quite representative, as it covers 60% of the population. Completeness was 82%, positive value predictive was 58%, and data validity was 86%. The median duration between patient admissions and reporting was 2.7 days. Conclusions The evaluation of the Egypt COVID-19 surveillance system indicated that the system partly achieved its objectives in the area of simplicity and flexibility with adequate data quality. There is a need to improve acceptability and timeliness through increasing manpower and to enhance stability through effective connectivity. Expansion of the system to cover all of the Egyptian population is recommended to improve representativeness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it