Approches et méthodologies d'inspiration vygotskiennes auprès de la Haute École spécialisée de la Suisse italienne
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work aims at illustrating the topicality of Vygotsky’s thinking with regard to the application of two educational devices – Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Problem Solving Cooperative (PSC) – at one of the eight Swiss professional universities: the University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (www.supsi.ch). The distinctive feature of these approaches is that of placing the student at the heart of the learning process, so that s/he becomes the protagonist in the acquisition of the knowledge and skills necessary for the exercise of their future profession; we focus on social and health areas. These two didactic practices engender a fruitful comparison with Vygotsky’s theoretical elaboration, especially with certain key concepts of his conceptual and methodological framework: the relevance of the historical-cultural context for the subject’s growth, the zone of proximal development, the heuristic force of social interaction (in a community/group) allowing the learner to build new cognitive tools, the centrality of metacognition for learning. The main claim is that, although Vygotsky carried out his research and observations especially with regard to childhood, his contribution may very well extend to the condition of adult learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it