The role of supply chain visibility, supply chain flexibility, supplier development on business performance of logistics companies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of supply chain visibility on business performance, to determine the effect of supply chain flexibility on business performance and to determine the effect of supplier development on business performance. The sample of respondents in this study were 120 respondents from logistics companies in Tangerang. Type of research is quantitative research. The data analysis technique used structural equation modeling and SmartPLS for analyzing data. The data collection method in this study was carried out using a survey method, namely by distributing online questionnaires to respondents in the form of questions. The data collection method in this study was an online questionnaire by google form. The sample selection method in this study is simple random sampling. The results of the analysis that have been carried out concluded that Inventory Control, Supply Chain Flexibility, Supply Chain Visibility, Supplier Development had positive and significant influence on business performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it