Ongoing Asthenospheric Upwelling and Delamination‐Style Down‐Welling Beneath Northeast China: Evidence From High‐Resolution Magnetotelluric Profiles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Northeast China was formed during the progressive closure of the Paleo‐Asian Ocean before the Early Mesozoic, and was then later affected by the westward subduction of the Paleo‐Pacific Plate and the west‐to‐east closure of the Mongolia‐Okhotsk Ocean. Huge volumes of granites were emplaced across this region during the Mesozoic, and widespread Cenozoic volcanism is still active in the Quaternary. To study past and present magmatic processes in this region, two parallel high‐resolution magnetotelluric profiles were collected to produce lithospheric resistivity models. Northwest of the Greater Xing'an Range, the lithosphere has a relatively low resistivity. The resistivity of the upper mantle low‐resistivity anomaly (C2) is consistent with the presence of a few percent of basaltic melt. This feature connects with a shallower low‐resistivity zone (C1) that extends into the crust. Its properties are consistent with 5–10% shoshonitic melt. The lithosphere in the southeast part is highly resistive. The upper mantle high‐resistivity zones (R1 and R2) are interpreted as regions of thickened lithosphere that may be undergoing delamination. The lower crust exhibits localized low‐resistivity zones (C3, C4, and C5), and they are interpreted as partial melt which may have originated in the ongoing upwelling. The overall pattern of magmatism appears to be driven by asthenosphere upwelling which might have been triggered by the Paleo‐Pacific Plate retreat, but the upper mantle low‐resistivity zone originates and rises from the northwest. Down‐welling in the southeast might be the combined effect of the subduction and retreat of the Paleo‐Pacific Plate and the instability of thickened lithosphere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".